Cap & Trade Comes to Fullerton

Cap & Trade AB 32: Important Information that will greatly impact your life

CAMPAIGN FOR CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL TRUTH

COME AND HEAR WARREN DUFFY DISCUSS WHY:

“CAP AND TRADE” Coming To California January 1, 2012

CAP Energy – TRADE Freedom

CFACTSOCAL

YOUR #1 SOURCE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL TRUTH-TELLING

No Exaggerations.....No Half-Truths......No Nonsense

SIZZLER RESTAURANT @ 6:30 pm

1401 N. Harbor.
Fullerton CA 92835
Thursday, MAY 19th



LEARN MORE AT www.cfactsocal.org

P.O. Box 1190 Huntington Beach, CA 92647
$ave California $en$ibly ---Speak up NOW

ATF Day



North OC Conservative Coalition's Call to Action

Please take a look at these important California bills that are being introduced into our legislature today.  We need to be aware because they affect our children, our future.  While we are worried about jobs and high gas prices, our Democrat legislature is working hard to change our society.

Senate Bill (SB) 48 was authored by Senator Mark Leno (D-San Francisco), an openly homosexual legislator who has authored and sponsored many bills specific to the advancement of homosexuality in education, employment, and family codes.

SB 48’s stated purpose is to mandate that California’s social science curriculum include the contributions of homosexuals to contemporary society, including bisexuals and transsexuals.  However, the responsibility to identify and select contributors of significance to our contemporary society should not rest in the hands of California’s Legislature.  SB 48 mandates the inclusion of the roles of “lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender Americans.”

No one should deny – based on sexual orientation – the mention of a person’s significant contributions to society.  However, never before in social science textbooks has sexual orientation, of any kind, been a mandated factor by which to select contributors, nor has law mandated the mention of a contributor’s sexual orientation.

Senate Bill 48, if passed, would place decisions regarding age-appropriateness of content and issues of academic accuracy outside the awareness of parents, who are primarily responsible for the welfare of their children.

The underlying impact of SB 48’s passage is the advancement of a pro-homosexual worldview in the public classroom, and the marginalization of all worldviews that conflict with such a view.  In addition, this bill promotes one’s sexual identity over and above one’s societal contributions.

Following are other current legislative bills that:

1. Promote the advancement of homosexuality as a special, legally protected class
2. Threaten freedom of speech and religion
3. Promote public schools as the primary source of child-rearing

Advancement of Homosexuality as a Special Class –

AB 9 (Ammiano, D-San Francisco) Education: Bullying – expresses the intent of the Legislature to “enact legislation to protect pupils from acts of bullying by requiring school personnel to report known or suspected instances of bullying to law enforcement entities.” 

AB 433 (B. Lowenthal, D-Long Beach) Transgender Birth Certificates – Under current law, whenever a person born in this state has undergone surgical treatment for the purpose of altering his or her sexual characteristics to those of the opposite sex, a new birth certificate may be prepared reflecting the change of gender and any change of name.  A petition for the issuance of a new birth certificate must be filed in the superior court of the county in which the petitioner resides and accompanied by a physician’s affidavit.  AB 443 would consider the affidavit irrefutable evidence and no longer allow the filing of challenges, and would allow the petition to be filed in any county.

AB 620 (Block, D-San Diego) GLBT Rights: Postsecondary Education – would greatly expand the special rights of homosexual students and faculty at public colleges and universities, and implement anti-harassment and awareness training for staffs.

AB 673 (Perez, D-Los Angeles) Office of Multicultural Health:  LGBT Communities – The Office of Multicultural Health is tasked with coordinating various activities and planning to close gaps in health and access to care among California’s diverse racial and ethnic communities.  AB 673 would expand the oversight of the office to include lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender communities as well.

SB 182 (Corbett, D-San Leandro) Judiciary Demographic Data – would attempt to increase the number of homosexual judges by adding sexual orientation and gender identity to the demographic data collected by the governor’s office for judicial applicants. 

SB 651 (Leno, D-San Francisco) Eliminates Differences: Marriage and Domestic Partnerships – would “declare the intent of the Legislature to enact legislation that would eliminate statutory differences between marriage and domestic partnerships.”

SB 747 (Kehoe, D-San Diego) LGBT Sensitivity Training for Health Care Providers – would require that health-care personnel complete a continuing-education course in “cultural competency, sensitivity, and best practices for providing adequate care to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons.” 

Threatening Freedom of Speech and Religion

AB 123 (Mendoza, D-Norwalk) School Safety: Disruption Threatening Pupils – would limit outside disruptions to students arriving, on school grounds, or leaving schools by controlling “disruptive” or threatening access to schools, school grounds, or nearby streets, sidewalks, or public ways.  AB 123 amends an older law and there is some cause for concern as the new bill deletes a section of law that provides protection for freedom of speech and assembly.

SB 117 (Kehoe, D-San Diego) Public Contracts: Prohibiting “Discrimination” Based on Gender or Sexual Orientation – would prohibit state agencies from contracting for $100,000 or more with contractors who discriminate in providing benefits to employees’ spouses or domestic partners based on gender or sexual orientation.

Promote Public Schools as the Primary Source for Child-rearing

AB 499 (Atkins, D-San Diego) Minors: Medical Care: Consent – Current laws allows children as young as 12 to consent to medical care without parental knowledge or permission in certain instances; this laws would expand that consent to medical care related to the prevention of a sexually transmitted disease.

SB 13 (Liu, D-Glendale) Pupils: Teen Dating Violence Prevention – would authorize a school district to provide teen dating violence-prevention education as part of the sexual health and health education program it provides to grades 7 to 12.

Muslim Extremism vs GOP Extremism: Who is Right?

By now many Fullerton residents have seen the video put together by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) which shows among others, Congressman Ed Royce and Villa Park Council member Deborah Pauly. 

The video shows portions of Pauly and Royce's speeches and is mixed with images of women and children entering the Yorba Linda Community Center against a backdrop of angry protesters. 

The video does not distinguish between the rally attended by the public officials and the small group of obnoxious protesters near the center.  The video also excludes the fact that the keynote speakers, the driving reason for the rally in the first place, have long been closely associated with terror groups. 

First, CAIR is the public relations front of Hamas, a terrorist group in Israel.

So when the Voice of OC, a public relations front and media machine for the Orange County Employee's Association stated that "At least one major Muslim advocacy group has demanded that Orange County's Republican party's condemn the protest and comments from elected officials who were present" and that same "advocacy group" is CAIR, you begin to understand the nature of the debate.

Pauly admits her statements at the rally were too general and unfairly painted all Muslims with the same broad brush. 

The Fullerton Sentinel would like to point out an obvious fact: Nearly ALL of the religious violence committed on earth is done so at the hands of Muslims attempting to rid the world of "infidels."

If CAIR or any other Muslim group would like to change that simple fact, convince your Imams that violence brings about violence, not peace.  And in order to change the way the West views Muslims, Muslims must change from within.  Does Islam have the capacity to accept peace?  Watch this video and decide.


The Yorba Linda rally is a good example of people freely meeting and expressing their views.  Unfortunately, a small group of people, CAIR and the protesters at the entrance to the center, have successfully focused attention away from those keynote speakers who support terrorism. 

Fullerton residents have the capacity to understand that fanaticism in any form is usually bad.  Residents also have the capacity to view the CAIR video with suspicious eyes. 

Important Meeting Tonight!

CALLING ALL CONSERVATIVES!

California in Chaos -

Our Strategy to fight back!

Guest Speaker Advocates for Faith & Freedom

Constitutional Attorney *Robert Tyler *

You Will Not Want To Miss This Critical Report From The Battlefield!

When? TONIGHT - Thursday, February 17, 2011

             Dinner 6:15 pm – 7pm (on your own)

             Meeting 7:00 pm -8:30 pm

Where? Sizzler Restaurant

              1401 North Harbor Blvd.

              Harbor/Brea Blvds

              Fullerton 92835

Cost?    FREE!!!

Advocates for Faith & Freedom (www.faith-freedom.com) is a 501c3 Legal Defense firm, specializing in the defense of religious freedom, parental & churches rights and other civil liberties. They work diligently without charge to provide their clients with the necessary legal support to affect a positive change in law & culture.

No RSVP Required. 

Happy New Year

The Fullerton Sentinel wishes you a very happy New Year!

Get back to your roots, Tea Party

By ALLY BORDAS
For the Daily Titan

The Tea Party movement: bringing back the Patriots at full force to squash out micromanaging government control. The TPM is currently a group of mainly Republican people who are pissed off about the way the government is being run. All you tea partiers, join the club. AKA the majority of America who isn’t running around in golden underwear basking in the millionaire’s club and benefiting from our current legislation.

But what separates the TPM from the rest of pissed off America is the fact that they are in fact doing something (even if they have whored their original ideals to corporate America and the ever-present and corrupted media).

Today some might view the tea partiers as extreme right-wing conservatives. But was this party ever free from societal constraints and media intimidation?

I clearly remember the one time I applauded them for figuratively shoving at fatty middle finger in Capitol Hill’s face…I also think that it’s good to see that some of the more, shall I say, older citizens of this country are trying to do something instead of complain, since the youth are too immature and radical to know what they are talking about (that was meant to be read as sarcastic).

I am an indecisive tea party sort-of supporter. Meaning that I find myself agreeing with a few parts of their original manifesto. Original being the key word in that previous sentence.

This movement was pure at the beginning. It came on strong after three federal laws began pissing people off: Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and a series of health care reform bills. With Ron Paul as its enthusiast and re-newer of the phrase “Tea Partier,” he started this liberal nation-wide movement with fiscal conservatism at its roots demanding change through 10, well-thought out guidelines for congressional candidates to follow.

So, what the hell happened to you guys? The TPM started out as such an innovative catalyst that could possibly bring about change. Now instead of organized national and local protests with educated followers and leaders, you have people joining the movement because they “just don’t like Obama,” and they do not even know why (according to an article from The Policy Page).

Today’s Tea Partiers do not like being associated with political parties, and some say that it is not a party at all, but more of an “anti-party.” F–k the system man, let’s rebel! Ok that is a bit extreme, but there are definitely some extremists strutting around as a “Patriot”.

An example: the Sept. 22 St. Louis Tea Party protesters finally revealing to the world that Obama is Hitler reincarnate without realizing that “in fact the Tea Party’s own fanatical style of politics is itself incredibly similar to that previously imbued by leaders of the Third Reich” quoted the Daily Fortnight paper.

Nice job guys. Seriously that doesn’t sound like you are being hypocritical at all. Perfectly calm and rational. Cough cough.

Judging the modern day TPM, do I agree with the fact that it is now somewhat infested with ultra-conservative sticks-up-their asses ignorant pricks (Sarah Palin)? No.

Do I support the fact that they are now a corrupted group with their backs against the wall and the media breathing down their necks? Oh, no.

This bandwagon titled: “Tea Party: The right thing to do or DIE a cruel death of government oppression” is now just a popular fad drowning out independent ideas and being replaced with conservative, mainly anglo supporters.

With people like Christine O’Donnell supporting the TPM, it is time to run for the hills, despite all of the rouge wildfires. I would rather die of smoke inhalation than have a certified nut-case as part of our government who claims she is a die-hard tea partier.

In case you don’t know her, O’Donnell is the recent Republican Party nominee for Delaware U.S. Senate. She is also known for saying she is capable of stopping all sexual intercourse in America, dabbling in satanical witchcraft, looking and acting like Palin’s twin and outwardly opposing “all abortions except if a woman is going to die, in which case her family could decide which life to save,” according to an article written by Politics Daily in September.

The fact that the “new” tea partiers and Sarah Palin have made her a celebrity over night cannot be a good endorsement for this once legitimate movement.

The TP manifesto was, in one phrase, “let’s kick it old school.” They wanted to bring the government back to its Constitutional roots and support lower taxes, wanted less government control, according to USA Today had a “firm conviction that the federal government has gotten too big and too powerful and a fear that the nation faces great peril” and in that same USA Today article stated that the TPM felt that “illegal immigrants in the long run cost taxpayers too much by using government services rather than becoming productive citizens.”

All this to stop the government from suffocating our economy through regulatory bureaucracies.
Such inspiring ideas…where did they go? Where did all the original supporters go? Stand up and speak out against the disgrace this nation has caused on your movement.

Any movement that has been sold to and endorsed by Sarah Palin and her drone Christine O’Donnell makes me want to burn down Capitol Hill and start all over again.

It freaks me out that people support these asylum escapees, especially when this movement was originally grassroots formed to bring forth REAL change. What sell-outs.

What do I really think?

I think capitalism is getting out of hand (big box corporations anyone?).

I think that our George Orwell depicted Big Brother government is micromanaging every facet of our lives.

I love people that speak out about their Constitutional rights because the government is too saturated with fat and self-satisfaction to care about the Constitution anymore.

The chant: “no taxation without representation!” needs to be reinstated in everyday vocabulary.
Don’t get me wrong-I mean I love tea (especially English-made tea) and I love a good party (especially one with revolution as its theme).

But putting them together and starting a now out-of-control corrupted-from-within-movement…hmmm, let’s just chuck Christine O’Donnell into Boston Harbor.